Encountered on my “autocatalytic closure” searches:

An excellent set of references and reviews: COMPUTER MODELS OF EVOLUTION;
from which I snitched:

Kauffman, Stuart A. Investigations: The Nature of Autonomous Agents and the Worlds They Mutually Create September 13, 1996.
Kauffman, Stuart A. “What is life?: was Schrödinger right?” p 83-114 What is Life? The Next Fifty Years, Michael P. Murphy and Luke A. O’Neill, eds. Cambridge University Press 1995. ;

Liane Gabora’s AUTOCATALYTIC CLOSURE IN A COGNITIVE SYSTEM: A TENTATIVE SCENARIO FOR THE ORIGIN OF CULTURE;

I am skeptical of Kauffman’s brave thrust but I can find no worse pessimism to throw at it than Kauffman has already provided in his introduction.
Yet two small points. Thermodynamics, which he looks to as a role model of a new kind of science, deals at its core with averages. Evolution thwarts averages by selecting the unusual and greatly amplifying it. I think that this is equivalent to edge of chaos observations.
I fear that evolution theorists, being themselves creatures of evolution, cannot foresee future evolution, just as a computation cannot be generally predicted short of running the computation. Perhaps all evolution theory must be retrospective.

recent ideas